Are children’s judgments of another’s accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Achievement goals affect metacognitive judgments.
The present study examined the effect of achievement goals on metacognitive judgments, such as judgments of learning (JOLs) and metacomprehension judgments, and actual recall performance. We conducted five experiments manipulating the instruction of achievement goals. In each experiment, participants were instructed to adopt mastery-approach goals (i.e., develop their own mental ability through...
متن کاملChildren's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments.
Recent studies have shown that the metacognitive judgments adults infer from their experiences of encoding effort vary in accordance with their naive theories of intelligence. To determine whether this finding extends to elementary schoolchildren, a study was conducted in which 27 third graders (M(age) = 8.27) and 24 fifth graders (M(age) = 10.39) read texts presented in easy- or difficult-to-e...
متن کاملMetacognitive Judgments of Improvement are Uncorrelated with Learning Rate
Being able to assess one’s own learning rate is essential for optimal learning. Can students accurately assess their learning rate, and is the timing of judgments of improvement important? In this experiment, students were to estimate their learning rate on each trial, either before the trial, or immediately after. If students typically make these judgments before embarking on further study, ac...
متن کاملConfidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.
Confidence-accuracy (CA) calibration was examined for absolute and relative face recognition judgments as well as for recognition judgments from groups of stimuli presented simultaneously or sequentially (i.e., simultaneous or sequential mini-lineups). When the effect of difficulty was controlled, absolute and relative judgments produced negligibly different CA calibration, whereas no significa...
متن کاملAccuracy of deception judgments.
We analyze the accuracy of deception judgments, synthesizing research results from 206 documents and 24,483 judges. In relevant studies, people attempt to discriminate lies from truths in real time with no special aids or training. In these circumstances, people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments, correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as nondeceptiv...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Metacognition and Learning
سال: 2021
ISSN: 1556-1623,1556-1631
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-021-09263-x